Eli kaksi asiaa saattaa mennä sekaisin, mutta myös se pätee mitä aiemmin puhuin. Eii siis saa sekoitaa subframe brace ja Clämppiä keskenään. Tässä kuitenkin jotain poimintoja
Skip the subframe brace. Many have learned the hard way. These things eat ground clearance and when they get bent, it distorts the subframe. If you get lowering springs, it olny gets worse. Many have cracked oil pans to. And when you have good tires and brakes, during hard braking, weight transfer lowers the front end, then you hit the pot hole or whatever. So you don't want the SFB amd therefore you don't want the complete VRK anyways. The VRK does not contain front sway bar bushings at all and the lateral control arm bushing is not in the VRK, and that is a very important bushing.
Ja Clämppi
I've been working on DIY brace designs, too. I don't think the firewall will be ripping like paper, but I am trying to design to eliminate metal fatigue and eventual firewall cracking. The (stock) thick rubber bushing prevents metal fatigue because it eats up all the side to side rack motion. As soon as you clamp something firmly to the firewall, it will transfer that flexing to the firewall. I doubt if it will rip out in the first few thousand miles, but over time it may develop some cracks. It's really going to be a pain to tear everything out to reweld the firewall, so I'm going to start out bracing to something reasonably solid when I beef up the clamp.
I am not saying your efforts aren't producing good ideas, just that the whole point of a brace is to promote rigidity,a solid clamp with no brace is not as effective, and will trasnfer all the energy to the clamp footprint on the firewall. Depending on how big your tyres are, HP in the car, stayle of bracing the rack, you could have a problem or not.
vai sotkinko mä taas kask asiaa keskenään
